The absolute majority of policy-makers work under the assumption that the laws of labor markets somehow doe not apply to teachers. The professions is somehow exempt from the basic laws of economics, like supply and demand. Every few decades, the US educational systems go into paroxysms of teacher shortages. The panic results in urging to prepare more teachers, exalting the virtues of teaching profession, and just luring more people in. ‘
However, teacher educators prepare more than enough
teachers; our school districts just cannot hold on to them. The problem is
about 90% in teacher retention, and only about 10% in supply problems. The
labor shortages in other professions are resolved differently. For example,
when we do not have enough plumbers, the labor market reacts, and their wages
go up. Some people agree to pay more, and eventually more people will want to
be lumbers, while others will learn how to install a toilet on their own, and
the demand shrinks. The market balances itself. If a teacher would make $100,000
a year, we would have no shortage, and could be more selective in who we admit
into the profession. Millions of people with credentials that do not work in
schools will return to classroom. No exaltations of virtuous teachers would be
needed, no heroism, or the language of public service. Of course, no one wants
to significantly increase taxation to pay for it, hence the hand wringing.
It would be much more honest for, say, the California State
Assembly to pass a resolution like this: “Sorry, folks, we overpromised and cannot deliver. We built a huge universal
educational system, made promises of quality teaching and afterschool enrichment,
of supporting equal chances in life for children of different backgrounds, of and
services to children with special needs. But we cannot do it on the tax money
we can collect from you. Not enough teacher want to work for the salaries we
pay. Therefore, the State is declaring the great educational bankruptcy. Starting
tomorrow, the school districts are allowed to collect tuition from parents who
can afford to pay it, and use the additional
revenue to compete for better teachers. All the promises are off the table.
Free and universal public education ends now. It was a good run, but alas the
public does not really want it.” This is not what I want to happen, just
pointing out this would be an honest solution; more honest than letting tens of
thousands of absolutely unprepared substitute teachers to babysit the most needy
children.
No comments:
Post a Comment